<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/resources/xsl/"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Hillingdon Times | Heathrow Debate</title>
    <link>http://www.hillingdontimes.co.uk/no_to_heathrow/heathrowdebate/</link>
    <description>Hillingdon Times /no_to_heathrow/heathrowdebate/</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:00:31 +0100</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:00:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://www.hillingdontimes.co.uk/no_to_heathrow/heathrowdebate/rssterms/</docs>
    <generator>M6</generator>
    <managingEditor>nvincent@newsquest.co.uk (Nigel Vincent)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@digitalmedia.newsquest.co.uk (Tim Joy)</webMaster>
    
    <atom:link href="http://www.hillingdontimes.co.uk/no_to_heathrow/heathrowdebate/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
           <title>John Randall &#40;Con, Uxbridge)</title>
           
           <link>http://www.hillingdontimes.co.uk/no_to_heathrow/heathrowdebate/3858856.John_Randall__Con__Uxbridge_/?ref=rss</link>
           
           
           <description><![CDATA[
  I shall try to be as brief as possible. I completely share the views of my neighbour and, dare I say, comrade in arms, the hon. Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell). Certainly, on this
  issue, we are comrades. He rightly said that this is far too important a subject for us to get into petty, party political arguments on it. I have to say that I was extremely disappointed by the
  manner in which the Secretary of State made his speech. I do not think that it did the debate any good at all. I am sure that if he reflects on it—perhaps I will buy him the DVD so that he can
  watch it—he will realise that he got it badly wrong.
]]></description>
           <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">a04b1dcd505fd35628abf1d668bcdab8</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
           <title>Nick Hurd &#40;Con, Ruislip-Northwood)</title>
           
           <link>http://www.hillingdontimes.co.uk/no_to_heathrow/heathrowdebate/3858859.Nick_Hurd__Con__Ruislip_Northwood_/?ref=rss</link>
           
           
           <description><![CDATA[
  I am the third Hillingdon MP to speak. My constituents are not being thrown out of their homes and they are not losing their churches, schools and cemeteries, but Hillingdon speaks with one voice
  on this issue. My constituents’ quality of life will be affected, by the new flight path and by an increase in traffic on the roads—but stronger than that is the real sense that Heathrow is big
  enough and that the social and environmental costs are too great to proceed. A voice says, “We were told that terminal 5 was the end of it. That was a lie, so why should we believe anything else
  that is said by this Government or by anyone involved with this process?” The message from Hillingdon is that enough is enough.
]]></description>
           <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">f987330e9b0ea2d2bafe5991f9cc5a1c</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
           <title>John McDonnell &#40;Lab, Hayes &amp; Harlington)</title>
           
           <link>http://www.hillingdontimes.co.uk/no_to_heathrow/heathrowdebate/3858852.John_McDonnell__Lab__Hayes___Harlington_/?ref=rss</link>
           
           
           <description><![CDATA[  For literally thousands of my constituents, the debate is too important for party political knockabout or policy making by electioneering.
]]></description>
           <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="false">bb186965d0407e978c0ec5f4b6acebf9</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>